Trusts are powerful tools for preserving legacy, protecting assets, and caring for loved ones. But trusts aren’t immune to conflict. Whether due to unexpected changes, beneficiary disappointment, or concerns about how a trustee manages assets, trust litigation can happen. And when a trust is litigated, it’s generally an emotionally and legally complex experience. It’s essential to understand some of the primary reasons people challenge trusts and how the litigation process might unfold. What are the most common reasons someone would contest a trust? And, how can I protect my trust from future litigation? Continue reading to find the answers to your questions and to learn more about trusts.
Why someone might contest a trust
There are many legitimate grounds for a beneficiary or other interested party to challenge a trust. One of the most common reasons is lack of capacity. This means that someone is questioning whether the person who created the trust, “the settlor,” understood what they were signing when they established it. If cognitive decline, illness, or undue influence were at play, a court might agree that the trust’s validity is questionable. Undue influence is another major reason parties might contest a trust. Beneficiaries may argue that someone imposed pressure, manipulated the settlor, or exerted a coercive presence when the trust was created or amended. These cases can be very sensitive, especially when familial relationships are involved.
Fraud, forgery, or duress are also well-trodden paths in trust litigation. If someone can demonstrate that terms were misrepresented or that signatures were obtained through force or falsification, a court may invalidate parts or all of the trust. Sometimes, the problem isn’t the trust itself but how the trustee is administering it. In those situations, litigation may focus not on invalidating the trust, but on holding the trustee accountable for breach of fiduciary duty. Failing to follow the trust terms, mismanaging assets, or acting in their own financial interests rather than in the interest of beneficiaries are actions that can lead to litigation.
Finally, no-contest clauses are worth watching closely. Some trusts include “in terrorem” provisions meant to discourage beneficiaries from suing by penalizing those who challenge the trust. These clauses can are meant to discourage litigation based purely on dissatisfaction with an inheritance or distributions. But, courts might refuse to enforce these clauses when the challenge is grounded in real concerns like fraud or mismanagement.
What to expect in the litigation process
Contesting a trust usually starts with a petition filed in the appropriate court, often a probate or surrogate court, naming the trustee and other relevant parties. From there, Discovery begins. Discovery is the process of collecting documents, such as the trust instruments, accountings, and correspondence, obtaining depositions, and potentially gathering medical or financial evidence if capacity or influence is at issue. It’s essentially the fact-finding phase of the case, where each side gains access to information the other holds, helping clarify what really happened and shaping the strategy for the rest of the litigation.
Before diving into full-blown litigation, many trust disputes can be resolved via mediation or negotiation. Mediation allows beneficiaries and trustees to air grievances, negotiate solutions, and find agreements outside the courtroom, often saving money and preserving relationships. If mediation fails, or the allegations are more serious and complex than a mediation process can handle, litigation proceeds. A beneficiary may ask the court to remove the trustee, surcharge (i.e., financially penalize) them for losses, or demand a full accounting of how assets have been handled. Courts can also interpret ambiguous provisions or even invalidate the trust if foundational problems are proven. One risk to consider: sometimes trust instruments allow trustees to use trust funds to defend against challenges, but not always. In some jurisdictions, courts have ruled that trustees cannot use trust assets to wage litigation that benefits only certain beneficiaries, unless the trust explicitly permits it.
Ways to contest a trust
To succeed in litigation to contest a trust, the challenger must meet some important legal thresholds:
- Capacity: Demonstrating that the settlor lacked the mental ability to form the trust. Courts will look for medical records, expert testimony, and evidence of cognitive impairment or illness.
- Undue influence: Proving manipulation, coercion, or overbearing presence. This is often one of the trickiest claims to prove, because people don’t usually issue written threat.
- Breach of fiduciary duty: Showing that a trustee failed to administer properly by mismanaging assets, making self-dealing decisions, or failing to account or report to beneficiaries.
- Improper execution: Claiming that the trust doesn’t meet the formal requirements under state law (i.e., missing signatures, required witnesses, or not following statutory formalities)
- No-contest clauses: Venues vary, but many courts will not enforce these clauses if a challenge is made in good faith on legally recognized grounds like lack of capacity or fraud.
Ultimately, succeeding in a trust contest means weaving together solid evidence, credible testimony, and a legally recognized theory of wrongdoing. This is because courts are generally reluctant to overturn a trust unless the challenger can show a clear and compelling reason to do so.
Practical considerations for beneficiaries
If you’re thinking about contesting a trust, here are some very practical things to consider:
- Act early: Many states impose strict time limits (statutes of limitations) on trust contests. Delay could jeopardize your ability to challenge.
- Gather evidence discreetly: Meet with an attorney to explore what documents you’ll need, such as medical records, financial statements, and relevant communications.
- Consider mediation: Before litigation, ask whether mediation or alternative dispute resolution might work. It’s often faster, cheaper, and less emotionally charged.
- Prepare for cost: Trust litigation can be expensive. Legal fees, expert witnesses, and court costs add up quickly. Make a realistic evaluation of whether the potential benefit justifies the risk.
- Clarify your goals: Do you want to invalidate the trust, force better management, or remove the trustee? Your goals shape how you frame the lawsuit.
Taking time to understand your goals, the costs, and the available alternatives ensures that if you do move forward, you’re doing so with the best possible strategy.
When a trustee can defend but not penalize
In some situations, beneficiaries may challenge a trustee’s actions or inaction. For example, beneficiaries can challenge a trustee for mismanagement without actually attacking the trust’s foundational validity. Litigation over such trust administration issues doesn’t necessarily trigger no-contest provisions, because the claim is not challenging the trust but enforcing it. Claims focused strictly on breach of duty or mismanagement can often be pursued without risking disinheritance, depending on how the trust is written.
Final thoughts on contesting and litigating a trust
Trust litigation is rarely first on someone’s mind when they set one up, and for good reason. Trusts involve family, money, and deeply personal legacy issues. But when things go wrong, challenging a trust can be a pathway to accountability. Beneficiaries who bring well-grounded claims rooted in lack of capacity, undue influence, or fiduciary breach, are protecting not just their inheritance, but the integrity of the settlor’s wishes. If you’re considering contesting a trust or believe a trustee is acting improperly, it’s wise to reach out to a trust-litigation attorney early on. They can help you assess the strength of your claim, guide you through the legal process, and support you in exploring less adversarial solutions when possible. Trust litigation is an important tool that can help ensure that legacy is honored as it was intended.
Kendra Strong-Tehrani, is an attorney in Colorado that specializes in Prenups and Estate Planning for busy professionals and families. By providing comprehensive legal services, she helps to keep her clients out of court and conflict. She loves to offer my guidance and support no matter what stage of life her clients are in. Book a Q&A with Kendra here.
Book full prenup representation with Kendra here.
0 Comments