When people sit down to write a will or establish a trust, the focus is usually on who gets what: the house, the savings, the jewelry, maybe the family cabin by the lake. But there’s a less obvious decision that can significantly impact how your estate is divided. It often comes down to whether your assets are distributed per stirpes or per capita. It might sound like Latin legalese, and that’s because it is! But this small distinction can change the entire outcome of how your wealth is passed down, especially if one of your beneficiaries passes away before you do. But what does per stirpes and per capita distribution even mean? And, how do I know which is right for my estate? Continue reading to find the answers to your questions and to learn more about this important aspect of estate planning.
What does per stirpes mean?
Let’s jump into understanding per stirpes. Translated from Latin, it means “by branch.” In practical terms, it means that if one of your beneficiaries dies before you, their share of your estate goes to their descendants in equal parts. So, let’s say you have three children: Anna, Brian, and Chloe. If Brian passes away before you do, but he has two children of his own, then under a per stirpes distribution, Brian’s one-third share would go to his two kids. Each grandchild would inherit half of what their parent would have received, while Anna and Chloe still each get their one-third.
The key concept here is that your estate is divided along family branches, and each branch gets its fair portion even if someone in that branch is no longer living. It’s often considered the more “traditional” approach and is commonly assumed to be what most people want, especially when they want to ensure that grandchildren aren’t disinherited simply because their parent died first. Most estate planners default to per stirpes unless a client indicates otherwise.
How per capita works and how it differs
Per capita, by contrast, means “by the head.” It only distributes your estate among the living individuals in a particular generation. Let’s use the same example of Anna, Brian, and Chloe. If Brian passes away before you, his children would not receive anything unless they were specifically named. Instead, your estate would be split evenly between the remaining living beneficiaries. In this case, that would be Anna and Chloe.
It can feel cleaner or simpler, especially for people who want to keep their estate limited to a specific generation or who prefer to avoid splitting things among an expanding pool of descendants. But it also comes with risks. If you don’t explicitly include language about how to treat deceased beneficiaries or their children, you might accidentally exclude a whole branch of your family tree. Some people are surprised to learn that, without proper planning, even grandchildren they were very close to can be left with nothing.
A hybrid approach
There’s also a modern variation that blends the two approaches: “per capita at each generation” or “per capita with representation.” This method, used in many states like California and Pennsylvania, finds the nearest generation with surviving descendants and then distributes the shares equally among them. It tries to strike a balance between the clean simplicity of per capita and the branch-by-branch fairness of per stirpes. If all of these important decisions that could impact your loved one make your head and your heart ache, then find an estate planning attorney near you to help you walk through different scenarios. Take the time you need to make the right decisions.
Real-world impact
To illustrate how dramatically these choices can affect an outcome, consider the following situation. You have three adult children, one of whom passes away before you. That child has two kids of their own, your grandchildren. If your estate plan uses per stirpes, your grandchildren will inherit their parents’ share, and each branch of the family will be represented in the final distribution. But if your plan uses per capita, and doesn’t include grandchildren as beneficiaries, your estate is split only among your surviving children. That one-third share vanishes from your deceased child’s branch entirely. Depending on your wishes and your relationship with those grandchildren, that may or may not reflect what you truly want.
Family structure can make this choice even more nuanced. For example, in blended families or families with stepchildren, you’ll want to be especially intentional with your wording. Per stirpes generally only applies to biological or legally adopted descendants, so if you want stepchildren included, you must say so. Similarly, if one of your children has no kids while another has several, using per stirpes means each branch gets an equal starting share regardless of how many people are in it. That may feel perfectly fair to some and wildly uneven to others, depending on the dynamics.
Why specificity matters, especially across states
Many people assume that estate planning is a one-size-fits-all process, especially if they’re using an online platform or DIY tool. But state laws vary widely, and default interpretations can differ. In some states, like California, if you do not specify how you want your estate to be distributed, the law defaults to per stirpes per capita by generation (aka “by right of representation”). If you prefer per stirpes, then you should use specific language such as “to my children in equal shares, by representation.” In others states, courts may interpret vague language differently or apply a version of per capita if a beneficiary predeceases the testator and there’s no clear instruction in the document.
That’s why it’s critical not to rely on assumptions. If your will or trust doesn’t specify which distribution method to use, a probate judge may decide for you, and the result might not reflect what you intended. Worse, in cases where beneficiaries challenge an estate’s division, the lack of clarity can open the door to lengthy and expensive disputes. This is a result most families would rather avoid during an already difficult time. Additionally, if you move across state lines or own property in multiple states, each jurisdiction might apply inheritance laws differently. That’s one reason why reviewing and updating your estate plan every few years, or after major life events like births, deaths, marriages, or relocations, is so important.
What type of person prefers each method?
The choice between per stirpes and per capita often reflects personal values more than net worth. People who prioritize generational fairness or who want to make sure their grandchildren are taken care of even if their own children pass away, often choose per stirpes. This is especially common among people who grew up in multi-generational households or who’ve already experienced the loss of an adult child. Meanwhile, some people prefer per capita because they want to avoid fragmentation or complexity. For example, someone with a tight-knit group of adult children, no grandchildren, or a desire to keep the estate within one generation might lean toward per capita. Others simply feel more comfortable knowing that only their living beneficiaries will receive anything. There’s no wrong answer, but there is a wrong assumption. Choosing a distribution method without understanding how it works (or failing to choose one at all) can lead to surprises that no one saw coming.
Getting help when things aren’t straightforward
For families with straightforward structures and modest estates, choosing per stirpes or per capita may feel simple. But if your situation is more complex, say, you have a blended family, a disabled child who may need a special needs trust, or children with widely different life circumstances, it’s worth getting professional guidance. An estate planning attorney can help tailor your documents to ensure they reflect your intent, comply with your state’s laws, and adapt as your family grows or changes.
A legal professional experienced in estate planning can also help you combine both approaches. For example, you might choose per stirpes for your children but leave specific bequests per capita to a group of nieces and nephews. Or you may set up trusts for some beneficiaries while giving lump-sum gifts to others. The point is that the more clearly your estate plan reflects your values and vision, the more likely your hopes and intentions are to be followed. Both you and the people you love can enjoy the peace of mind that comes with a specific and thoughtfully crafted estate plan.
The final takeaway on per stirpes vs per capita distribution methods in estate planning
Words matter in estate planning, sometimes more than we realize. Per stirpes and per capita are just two small phrases, but they can carry tremendous weight. They determine how your love and legacy are passed down, and they shape who is remembered, supported, and included when you’re no longer here to make that call yourself. You don’t need to become an expert in Latin to get this right. You just need to be intentional, and ideally, work with someone who knows how to translate your wishes into legal language that holds up in every scenario. Choosing between these two methods is more than just a legal technicality. It reflects your values, your family structure, and how you want your legacy carried forward. And while many people use default language or online templates that choose one or the other for them, understanding the difference and making an intentional choice can help avoid unintended consequences, hurt feelings, and even legal battles.
Tofigh Law is a no-frills boutique law firm that helps individuals, families, and small businesses with their estate planning, family law, Islamic law, and small business matters.
0 Comments