Over the last few decades, we’ve seen more and more couples have an intention to discuss their future together (marriage, cohabitation, common-law partnership, to name a few options) as marriage becomes less of the default outcome. We’ve also seen the percentage of adults in the US who are living together, but not yet (or don’t plan to get) married increase.
With that trend, more and more couples are facing the (anxiety-provoking and awkward convo starter) question: Should we combine our finances before we get married? It’s tempting to think this is a simple math problem. But if you’ve ever tried to bring it up and ended up in a weird silence—or a passive-aggressive comment about “just Venmoing you later”—you know it can be way more emotional than logical.
This article unpacks what’s really going on when couples discuss merging their finances. We’ll follow a fictional couple who feel all too real, explore the deeper emotional and psychological dynamics, and offer some grounded (psychological) perspective on how to navigate this with more clarity and less panic.
Meet Riley and Cam
Let’s get familiar with our hypothetical couple, Riley and Cam. Riley is a graphic designer who freelances on the side, tracks her expenses religiously, and could probably teach a masterclass on how to optimize a Roth IRA. Cam works for a nonprofit, often forgets which card has money on it, and mostly avoids looking at his bank account (until something gets declined).
They’ve been together for four years, live in a small-but-cute rental with their rescue dog, and have recently started talking about marriage. They’ve survived IKEA furniture assembly and holidays, so they’re thinking, “So far, so good.”
But as a natural extension of the marriage conversation, they’re now circling the topic of money. And not just who pays for brunch, but whether they should actually combine their finances. Riley sees it as a natural next step, while Cam is feeling low-key terrified and wonders if it’s too soon. So, how are they handling all those feelings? By avoiding the conversation, of course.
Money represents values
The way we handle money as adults often mirrors what we learned growing up. Maybe your parents taught you to budget or save for a rainy day. Or maybe the lessons were more indirect, like hearing, “If I had the money, we’d take a real vacation,” or witnessing fights that made money feel like something to fear or avoid.
For some, money was a source of control. For others, it was never discussed. Sometimes it was framed as the ultimate marker of success. These early messages stick, shaping not just our spending habits but also the emotional charge that money brings to our relationships.
Riley grew up hearing constant talk about what the family couldn’t afford. For her, tracking every dollar became a way to feel safe. Cam’s parents swung between fighting and pretending everything was fine. He learned to tune money out entirely.
So when Riley suggests combining bank accounts, she’s trying to create shared security. But Cam hears it as added stress and pressure. They’re having two different conversations—without realizing it.

What to pay attention to (psychologically)
What do you need to pay attention to psychologically? It’s not the content in the conversations—it’s the emotional tone. Things like: how do partners react when the topic comes up? What does each one consider fair, and how do they handle it when those views differ?
With Riley and Cam, the content is focused on the pros and cons of merging accounts, but the emotional current runs deeper. Riley’s motivation is coming more from calming her own anxiety, while Cam’s resistance stems more from a fear of being judged or micromanaged. And, given that Riley earns more and has often set the financial tone in the past, Cam feels an unspoken pressure to go along to avoid conflict—but is feeling invisible, and a seed of resentment starts to build.
Financial decisions often rest on deeper issues, such as trust, autonomy, and psychological safety. When conversations avoid or miss the chance to address these layers, unresolved tensions tend to build—and often resurface later in the relationship.
The upside of combining finances before marriage
Merging money before marriage can help couples feel like a real team. And it can make a lot of things easier in your life together, such as paying bills, saving toward shared goals, and eliminating the “you owe me for dinner” vibe that can start to feel transactional. For many couples, it’s also a way to practice long-term planning and deepen trust.
And that’s exactly what Riley is hoping for. She’d love to move into a phase of life where everything isn’t so split and accounted for. She wants to be able to say, “This is ours,” whether it’s a savings account or a grocery bill. For her, merging money is a sign that they’re moving into a more adult, interdependent space (and that they’re in this thing called life together).
And with clear communication, this kind of system can work beautifully. However, it needs to be a genuine joint decision, not a superficial fix for deeper anxieties. When Cam hears Riley out—and Riley also slows down to understand Cam’s hesitations—they both begin to see that “shared” doesn’t have to mean “merged all at once.”
But it can backfire if you’re not ready
On the flip side, combining finances too quickly can cause stress. If one person feels that their autonomy is slipping, or if spending habits clash, a joint account can become a pressure cooker.
Cam’s biggest fear is feeling like every coffee or impulse purchase needs to be justified. He doesn’t want to end up resenting Riley—or himself—for losing that sense of financial freedom. He also has some lingering shame about his student debt, and he’s worried that merging money will make that burden feel shared in a way Riley didn’t fully sign up for.
These feelings—resentment, shame, guilt—are totally normal, and it’s what can lead couples to fight about finances long before they fight about anything else. It’s not the money that creates problems; it’s the silence, assumptions, and emotional overload that go along with it.
Compromising is key
Eventually, Riley and Cam land on a compromise: they keep their individual accounts and open a shared one for household expenses. They sit down and figure out a monthly contribution that feels fair, not necessarily equal in dollar amount, but proportional to what each can give. The rest stays separate.
Riley still gets the sense of partnership that she defines as the next step for their relationship, and Cam doesn’t feel boxed in or micromanaged. Most importantly, it provides them with a framework to check in regularly—monthly, initially—about what’s working and what’s not.
This “yours, mine, ours” setup allows them to find a middle ground; a structure without rigidity. But more importantly, Riley and Cam were able to have honest conversations about their fears, their needs, and solutions that can work for them right now (even if it changes in the future).
The questions that helped Riley and Cam
Those honest conversations didn’t just happen by chance. It took intention, lots of late-night convos, and even some tense moments.
They asked each other things like:
- What did money look like in your family growing up?
- If we combine our finances, what’s your biggest fear?
- What do we do if we break up?
- What would we use the shared finances for? What wouldn’t we use it for?
- What are hard nos for you, and what’s up for discussion?
- What do you need to feel financially respected and safe in this relationship?
These questions didn’t solve everything overnight, but they gave Riley and Cam a foundation—one built on mutual understanding, not just financial agreement. Questions like these and others are also part of a cohabitation agreement, and can be helpful in giving awkward conversations guidance.
The bottom line
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer to whether couples should combine finances before marriage. What feels right for one relationship might feel totally overwhelming—or just wrong—for another. The real question isn’t “Should we do it?” but “Are we actually ready for this—financially and emotionally?”
A lot of couples get into the conversation because of logistics. Rent’s due, someone’s covering more of the groceries, and it feels like merging money would just make things easier. But ease shouldn’t be the only reason. This needs to be a shared, intentional choice—one that comes from honest conversations about what money means to each of you, what you’re afraid of, and the kind of relationship you’re trying to build.
Whether you go all in, keep it separate, or find something in the middle, the point isn’t to get it perfect. It’s to create something that works for both of you—and that actually supports your relationship, not just your budget.

Dr. Vivian Oberling is a licensed clinical psychologist with degrees from UCLA, Harvard, and Stanford. In her private telehealth practice, she works with adults navigating anxiety, identity shifts, and relationship dynamics—whether they’re dating, partnered, or parenting. She also provides executive coaching and behavioral health advisory support to tech startups and legal tools reshaping how we think about love, marriage, and psychological safety. Dr. Oberling combines 10+ years of clinical expertise with modern, real-world insight to help people move through uncertainty with clarity and connection.

0 Comments